For those who ask why they cannot see Planet X, it is right there, hiding in plain sight! Here are three photos showing Planet X. All taken during the day. All showing Planet X as an orb and clearly in sight. In the first photo, taken by B. Watts on June 1, 2010, Planet X appears as a shadow. This is due to sunlight typically bouncing off the backside of the dust cloud shrouding Planet X and reflecting directly back toward the Sun. Thus we typically see a dim fuzzball, not a brilliant Second Sun.



ZetaTalk Comment 6/5/2010: The dark orb is clearly not a lens flare as it is not emitting light. It is a shadow. We have often described the difficulty in getting a snapshot of Planet X, because, in our words, it appears as a dim fuzzball, not a lighted mass but rather a dark fuzzy patch. This photo shows such a dim fuzzball, throwing sunlight back to the Sun. The dust cloud is not allowing sunlight through. Nice catch!

The second photos was taken in Salt Lake City, Utah on June 6, 2010 by a Pole Shift ning member.A flare can be seen, in front of the tree line. But Planet X is clearly visible standing part way behind the tree line, at about the 4 o'clock position to the Sun.



ZetaTalk Comment 7/3/2010: This is a true capture of Planet X, which only an educated eye would spot. The orb is clearly not a flare, stands partially behind a tree, is exactly round, with the correct amount of glow from a dust cloud evenly reflecting sunlight. Another excellent, and undeniable, catch.

The third instance was captured on June 5, 2010 by a balloon carrying a camera above the atmosphere - the Pacific Star II.

Question: Recently someone sent a homemade balloon into space (Pacific 2) with some cameras attached and programmed to take pictures every few minutes. It looks as if it may have captured planet X next to the sun at 1.49 in the video (picture also attached). Is this a genuine capture of planet x or is it a lens flare? And are the establishment concerned that they have no way of stopping people doing this and that if it becomes more popular there will be an increasing number of pictures of planet X turning up in the public eye and breaking the cover up?

VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/v/c4dWZODKQ2o


ZetaTalk Comment 6/26/2010: Despite the halo, this is a capture of Planet X. The Sun and Moon have halos these days because of the grease in the atmosphere from Planet X. When such objects appear, there is puzzlement among those unaware of the presence of Planet X, but when they bump into the rumors on the Internet, a connection is made. So indeed, such revelations are important, but just one of many such routes by which those previously unaware learn the truth. Will the establishment consider this a threat? Since this is not an official leak, and can be discredited by "experts", this is certainly not the threat that the appearance of Planet X and its Moon Swirls and the String of Pearls on SOHO have posed. What the establishment fears are signs in the skies that the public will not be persuaded to deny. Something like a Second Sun that is seen by the majority of the populace, worldwide. Something like a dancing Moon Swirl in the skies that does not have the trajectory that a group of asteroids might have. Then what?

NASA Warnings

In Issue 127, in an feature titled "Blame the Sun", I outlined the NASA plan to blame the sun for electromagnetic surge anticipated from the approach of Planet X. Unfortunately for NASA, the Sun has not cooperated.

What's Wrong with the Sun?
June 14, 2010
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627640.800-whats-wrong-with-the-sun.html?full=true

Sunspots come and go, but recently they have mostly gone. For centuries, astronomers have recorded when these dark blemishes on the solar surface emerge, only for them to fade away again after a few days, weeks or months. Thanks to their efforts, we know that sunspot numbers ebb and flow in cycles lasting about 11 years. But for the past two years, the sunspots have mostly been missing. Their absence, the most prolonged for nearly a hundred years, has taken even seasoned sun watchers by surprise.

ZetaTalk Prediction 3/6/2010: The excuses they planned to use were to blame the Sun for any electromagnetic problems, and they still plan to do so even though the severe interference with the Earth's magnetosphere started while the Sun was virtually asleep. They will grasp at every minor CME as proof of this theory. They had planned to blame rogue asteroids or asteroid swarms for the moons and debris in the tail of Planet X, and have already mustered this excuse forth, claiming that asteroids crash into each other producing dust clouds. Thus, the many moons seen on SOHO and the Stereo images, with a drifting tail of dust, were to be explained away. By inferring that the Chile quake altered the rotation time span of the Earth, they are trying to put into the public's mind the idea that quakes can affect rotation. Global Warming of course was to be the excuse for rising seas caused by heat rising from the core of the Earth, though this has now been taken from them. Any additional excuses they muster forth will not be believed, as what is about to unfold will take them by surprise!

But this has not stopped NASA from continuing their campaign. Trust us, they say, the Sun is going to do horrible things! They are still warning of a worst ever solar maximum, despite the fact that that Sun is simply not cooperating.

NASA Warns Solar Flares from 'Huge Space Storm' will cause Devastation
June 14, 2010
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7819201/

National power grids could overheat and air travel severely disrupted while electronic items, navigation devices and major satellites could stop working after the Sun reaches its maximum power in a few years. Senior space agency scientists believe the Earth will be hit with unprecedented levels of magnetic energy from solar flares after the Sun wakes "from a deep slumber" sometime around 2013.

ZetaTalk Prediction 3/27/2010: They are locked in a death march because of their prior lies, unable to tell the truth because they fear the reaction of the public, and thus they continue to lie even when it becomes obvious they are doing so. In this, they only make the final reaction of the public more enraged, but it takes courage to finally face the public and tell the truth and they would prefer to lie until it is time to bolt for their bunkers. However, we are here to tell them their lies won't stretch that far, and they will be caught at this game.

ZetaTalk Prediction 7/3/2010: The establishment knows that Planet X has just started to point its charged tail toward Earth, and has had a taste of what is to come with the downing of Air France 44 and the failure of several large dam turbines. How do they warn those responsible for keeping the grid up and build an anticipation of electronic failure into the public mind without admitting that Planet X is in the vicinity and about to cause havoc? Of course Dick Morrison's lecture attacked Nancy and her message as the first and foremost enemy, because we and we alone are pointing to the presence of Planet X in the inner solar system, and advising people on how to look for it. Meanwhile, the absurdity of describing the superstorm of the millenium while the Sun has virtually no sunspots or flares is not lost on the public. They are wondering what's up?

Notice that in that article, they moved the original 2011 date for the solar maximum forward now, from 2011 to 2012 and now 2012! Since a sleepy Sun in 2010 cannot be roaring into the typical solar maximum, they must do something to keep their credibility alive and well in front of the public.

NASA: Cosmic 'Superstorm' more Crippling than 20 Katrinas
June 17, 2010
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=167949

The new forecast suggests the solar storm could be at its peak activity in 2012 or 2013. The sun has been particularly quiet for the last few years in a protracted solar minimum. It has just woken up, as it were, and started its usual 11-year cycle a bit later than most.

Gulf Evacuation

Problems with resolving the Gulf oil spill has escalated, as the disbursant BP is using is toxic, and allow the oil to be lifted into the air, dropped in rain at a distance over land.

Acute Aquatic Toxicity of Three Corexit Products: An Overview
http://www.iosc.org/papers/00020.pdf

Corexit 9500 was found to be one of the most toxic dispersal agents ever developed. Even worse, according to this report, with higher water temperatures, like those now occurring in the Gulf of Mexico, its toxicity grows. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in discovering BP's use of this dangerous dispersal agent ordered BP to stop using it, but BP refused stating that their only alternative to Corexit 9500 was an even more dangerous dispersal agent known as Sea Brat 4. The main differences between Corexit 9500 and Sea Brat 4 lie in how long these dangerous chemicals take to degrade into their constituent organic compounds, which for Corexit 9500 is 28 days. Sea Brat 4, on the other hand, degrades into an organic chemical called Nonylphenol that is toxic to aquatic life and can persist in the environment for years. A greater danger involving Corexit 9500, and as outlined by Russian scientists in this report, is that with its 2.61ppm toxicity level, and when combined with the heating Gulf of Mexico waters, its molecules will be able to "phase transition" from their present liquid to a gaseous state allowing them to be absorbed into clouds and allowing their release as "toxic rain" upon all of Eastern North America.

This has resulted in what is termed "oil rain", with videos going viral on the Internet.

VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/v/uqr6eMNB8Ew


Wayne Madsen reports that the federal government has evacuation plans in place for any location within 200 miles of the Gulf oil disaster.

Wayne Madsen Report
June 23, 2010
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/06/23/

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the US Army Corps of Engineers. Emergency planners are dealing with a prospective "dead zone" within a 200 mile radius from the Deepwater Horizon disaster datum in the Gulf. Adding to the worries of FEMA and the Corps of Engineers is the large amounts of methane that are escaping from the cavernous grotto of oil underneath the Macondo drilling area of Gulf of Mexico. Federal officials dealing with the short- and long-term impact of the oil disaster report that the "dead zone" created by a combination of methane gas and Corexit toxic rain will force the evacuation and long-term abandonment of cities and towns within the 200-mile radius of the oil volcano. Plans are being put in place for the mandatory evacuation of New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Mandeville, Hammond, Houma, Belle Chase, Chalmette, Slidell, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pensacola, Hattiesburg, Mobile, Bay Minette, Fort Walton Beach, Panama City, Crestview, and Pascagoula.

Per the Zetas, any evacuation would be every limited, for a variety of reasons.

ZetaTalk Comment 7/3/2010: There are warnings that the entire Gulf region may become so polluted, due to the chemical disbursants used and how this allows the oil to be lifted into rain clouds, that the Gulf region may need to be evacuated. Of course such disaster recovery plans must be in place, as the soil spill has not proved stoppable. It is not the BP spill that is the worry, it is the fact that the Gulf is leaking oil and gas such as methane from multiple places, some not the result of drilling. The Gulf is under pressure, as we have explained, from the bowing of the N American continent, and this is the source of the leaks which will not entirely stop until the New Madrid adjusts. The US government has been aware of this pending disaster for decades, as they have been aware of the approach of Planet X since 1983. FEMA has plans for the New Madrid, but the oil leaks have taken it by surprise.

Will an evacuation from the Gulf actually occur, and will this prove to be a blessing in disguise for those living along the coastline when the hour of the shift arrives? Any evacuation will be extremely limited and only in those areas directly in front of winds coming directly off the oil spill. No government wants a large number of evacuees, as the problems involved increase exponentially as the areas being evacuated grow. Looting occurs when the police must also be evacuated. Lost persons problems multiply when families are disbursed to different locales. Distribution of food and supplies becomes confused as conflicting directives are received from various camps and authorities. Shelter can often be provided in neighboring areas, but if those neighboring areas themselves are evacuated, then the problems of keeping track of evacuees who are being repeatedly moved increases. Medical problems of those in need who have had to leave their familiar doctors and care givers likewise compound.

The old saying that 'there's no place like home' is more than a cliché. It is the reason that is it difficult in the worst of circumstances to get people to evacuate. Look to Katrina as a case in point. We have predicted that even when the last weeks are in full swing, when it is obvious that the world they know is turning upside down, there will be those who will insist on going through their day as through nothing were wrong. They will go to their jobs, bake a birthday cake for an occasion coming up soon, and be oddly cheerful about it all. Between an overwhelmed government and a reluctant public, evacuation of the entire Gulf region just won't happen.

You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly Unsubscribe. You can always access prior Newsletters from the Archives.